Jane english and the Analogy of the Hypnotized Attackers :: essays research papers

For our next paper I project on discussing abortion as a social issue. I extremity to do this inthe form of a critical paper This seems to be avery sticky subject and is one of the topics wehad in our fall apart that was very interesting to mewith a lot of room for interpretation as to whenit is or is not o.k. to abort the fetus if itshould ever be through at all. The argument I plan todiscuss is Jane Englishs coincidence of the spell-bound attackers which was not one of ourreadings, but one I came across in some research Idid for this upcoming paper. This analogy has todo with a softheaded scientist who abducts people,hypnotizes them and has them attack fairpasserbys. A major part of the analogy isrealizing that these people who are attackinginnocents are themselves innocent and would not becommitting the answers of violence that they areguilty of if they were not hypnotized and wereable to act on their own volition. They are actingon the will of the mad scientist. He is the onlybad person in this whole scenario. The innocenthypnotized attackers are representative of thefetus and the helpless attackee is representativeof the cleaning lady or women who are victims of theunwanted pregnancy. The analogy is to determinethe measure of suck that can that can be used bythe attacker to cling to onesself from theundesired attack of an undesirable pregnancydepending on what kind of monetary value the pregnancy maycause. I think that this analogy does a goodish jobin deciding how to subscribe with the burden ofpregnancy during much than yet the moment ofattack. Her narrative can grasp or deal with alot of possible situations. Jane English argues that if a fetus is aperson, abortion is still justifiable in somecases and if a fetus is not a person, killing itis still wrong in many cases (pg. 4). When Ifirst read this , or heard, this passage I snarlthat it was fairly wishy- washy. I felt that herargument really did not wee-wee a stand, but how canyou whe n you are not truly pro- selection orpro-life. She seems to be saying that there mustbe a good reason to end a life and not just forthe sheer convenience of it. I completely agree.Also, with this argument came the conception ofpersonhood. This concept seems to be what liberalsandconservatives are trying to define because it canbe stated at that exact moment when a fetusbecomes a person and therefore when abortion