Pros of Lowering Drinking Age Outline

Affirmative side for Lowering Legal Drinking Age (OUTLINE) 1) humankind rights. * Individuals who are leg all in ally allowed to vote and get married, sign legal contracts, jackpot cigarettes, can be responsible when it comes to drinking deluge beverage as well. turn of events 18 allows one to make their own decisions in life. * certainty 1 study Youth Rights Association does not feel this is an issue mainly about intoxicant rather it is an issue about equality, respect, discrimination and freedom.Americans of all ages, races, genders, and ethnicities deserve equal respect, and they deserve the right to make their own choices in life. 2) Drink safely in regulated environments * Prohibiting this age group from drinking in bars, restaurants, and other licensed locations causes them to drink in unsupervised places such(prenominal) as house parties where they may be much prone to stuff drinking and other unsafe behavior. * Evidence 1 Among college students, a tens worth of r esearch in the College Alcohol Study gear up the proportion of students engaging in frequent binge drinking had accessiond.Compared to 1993, more 18- 24 twelvemonth students who chose to drink in 2001 were drinking excessively- as defined by frequency of drinking occasions, frequency of drunkenness, and drinking to get drunk. * Evidence 2 College students experienced a nearly 10 percent amplification in the rate of drinking to get drunk between 1993 and 2001, which corresponded to an increase in secondary consequences and treatment for alcoholic beverage overdose. * Evidence 3 National estimates suggest that among full-time college students, 690,000 are knobbed in assaults, 97,000 are involved in rapes, and 599,000 are injured as a result of alcohol 3) Ineffective * Evidence 1 (Prohibition did not work then) In 1920, alcoholic beverages were banned in the United States. However, the government had created a huge contraband market for the intoxicating substance by encouraging the drinkers to switch to spirits. It is believed wide to have been a misguided and failed social experiment that made alcohol problems worse. Evidence 2 (Prohibition did not work now) 95% of those who will be alcohol consumers in their lifetime take their first drink in the lead age 21 * Evidence 3(Prohibition did not work now) 50% of 18-20 year olds consume alcohol regularly * Evidence 4(Prohibition did not work now) 75% of high school seniors, 60% of sophomores and 40% of eight graders have consumed alcohol * Evidence 5(Prohibition did not work now) 5,000 lives were lost each year by those under the age of 21. Of these, fewer than 40% are traffic fatalities. The commodious majority- over 60%- of alcohol-related fatalities take place off roadways