The Day the Cowboys Quit

Ashley Tran 900 AM History 1301 Lori Lehtola earth-closet chocolate-brown behind brownness was an abolitionist who had a big hatred over slavery. His feelings of hate were so healthy over slavery that it led him to seize the United States arsenal at Harpers Ferry. John began a huge massacre on the Pottawatomie Creek along the Kansas territory. It all began on the month October and the year of 1859. browned had a psychotic path of thinking and doing things. Johns dandy plan was to arm slaves for a future rebellion.He was an anti-slavery man and tried to do everything in his power to keep slavery from happening in Kansas, tho he was also a liquidator. I believe that he told populate he was anti-slavery, which he was, but had a feeling inside him that like taking other peoples lives. The three authors who contributed to the article rough John brownish were W. E. B. Du Bois, Robert Penn Warren, and David S. Reynolds. Their prize telescopes impacted their adopts of brown and his actions. W. E. B. Du Boiss background was greatly respected by embrowns article. W. E. B. elieved that because of John chocolate-browns actions over slavery, it gave everyone his or her right to freedom. According to Du Bois, all hands are equal and are no less than one another. Du Bois verbalise that slavery is wrong so we must kill it. His opinion is respected by Johns actions because he views it in a way in which that what John Brown did was right. He earned us our freedom. If it werent for what Brown did, we wouldnt have our freedom. W. E. B. was one of the most influential African American intellectuals of the 20th century. He played a founding position in the NAACP, which was a path breaking civilization.Because of how Du Bois viewed John Browns actions and how he strongly believed that what he did nearly slavery was right would be an impact on why he got involved with the National tie-in for the Advancement of Colored People. Robert Penn Warren believes that e ven though John Brown had such an enormous religious faith, God was not on neither sides of John Brown nor the South. What Brown did was abnormal and not Godly, according to Warren. Roberts background has impacted his view on John Brown in a way that he believed Brown was responsible for his felonious- like actions.He believes that what Brown did to the proslavery was not establish on God. Meaning, it wasnt a God based decision, it was more of a Godly excuse he apply towards his criminal actions. Robert mainly focused on themes of Southern culture and history. His personal arrangement of John Browns actions has greatly impacted his history about the south and his knowledge about its history of culture. David S. Reynolds wonders how John Brown could stripped murder with such a religious faith. David stated that Brown used violence in order to create a society bare of slavery and racism. He believed that John Brown didnt just do it for slavery, but did it because his goal was a d emocratic society race, religion, and gender didnt even matter. David has his particular opinion about Browns actions because he theory that what Brown did to these proslavery people wasnt for the reason he express for doing so. Reynolds background has impacted his view on John Brown and his actions because he can inform others about his opinion on Browns actions. His opinion reflects a twenty-first century on Brown informed by the September 11, 2001, terrorists attacks on the United States. Basically, he thought of John as more of a terrorist than a hero of slavery. W. E. B. Du Bois, Robert Penn Warren, and David S. Reynolds were all impacted in different ways by John Browns actions. Their own particular opinions were based on how they viewed John Browns actions. Johns huge massacre at Pottawatomie Creek was his psychotic way of handling things. He was a murderer of proslavery and his excuse was God. These three authors who contributed to John Browns article were concerned in Afr ican American society or Southern history. Their view on John Browns history has impacted their own.